missionaryAYElegs
I am in a slump. I am all written out. My brain is mush.
So I decided to play with Andrew’s photographs for our collaboration “69 Scheimpflug Street.” I am not sure he was amused – he sent me an article on how to crop and present images. Okay dokey. The article is on my desk somewhere. Surely.
I put the cropped images up on Twitter (TrudiYTaylor) and Tumblr (Cranky Writer in adult oriented category) with little captions. No one seems to mind. They get favorited, liked, etc.
The photographs are lovely. Erotic. Playful. My stories are sexy in unexpected ways (at least to my way of thinking and from the comments of our preliminary viewers).
And we are out of money for the series. Models cost. Locations can cost. Printing papers and final prints on aluminum cost. Our time costs. Yep like so many artists we eat that cost. So many costs – so little money.
So we looked into a Kickstarter funding process. They get good results. Participants have vouched for their veracity. But Kickstarter is not too keen on sexuality or nudity. They use the terms “slight” and “mild.” I understand their not wanting to promote pornography. Neither do we.
Here’s the dilemma – the exhibit is about moving sexuality and nudity from a slight and mild fuzziness into a more robust and integrated focus (think Scheimpflug Principle). We are sick of the all-or-nothing thinking this country has around sexuality. We must be hypersexual or asexual. What?
I am going to send in one uncompromised series of stories and photographs about a couple choosing to expand their sexual repertoire. The photographs contain full frontal nudity of a man and a woman. The stories are explicit.
I don’t hold out much hope …
Taking a different tack, Andrew found a site where we can sign up for patrons (yes, really, patrons). Another dilemma – we have to make videos to attract patrons. Now I do not have a problem asking for money for my services – got over that in graduate school for counseling. If you can’t ask for money, you do not value your product (whether it is counseling, widgets, or art). The dilemma is that I look like a mangy, cross-eyed cat in videos and sound like Julia Childs. Not an enticing combo when every one else on the site looks a sleepy 26 and adorable.
So what do you think? Is there a need or want for images and stories exploring, even pushing an integrated sexuality in our lives?
Would you rather support us with a monthly gift or with one monetary gift?
Send me your comments. Below are some preliminary images with my attempts at cropping.
AYElegs
couchhug
IMG_0093-2torso

2 thoughts on “NSFW – Mild or Robust Sexuality?

  1. I like the last photo. all nude. the first one is great but the colliding patterns of both rug and chair distracted me. Second one reminded me of the sixties. (nicely, but still the sixties)

    1. Laura, Thanks for the feedback. Great observations. I love all of the photos but the last one has a really sexy quality to it! The models were great – it feels like we captured, just for a sec, intimacy.
      Big hug,
      trudi

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Name *